MONEY LAUNDERING

Luxembourg falls further behind EU AML rules as companies fail to disclose ownership

Luxembourg has approved a further delay for companies to register their beneficial ownership details after 53% of affected entities failed to meet the original deadline.

Luxembourg has approved a further delay for companies to register their beneficial ownership details after 53% of affected entities failed to do so by the initial deadline.

More than 68,000 companies had not provided the required information by the August 31 deadline and they have now been given a further three months, according to the Luxembourg Times. Non-compliance can incur fines ranging from $1,370 (1,250 euros) to $1.37 million (1.25 million euros).

The latest delay means that the country has cast itself further adrift of the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, which required all EU member states to compile publicly available registers by June 2017 as a key component in combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

In November 2018, the European Commission referred Luxembourg to the European Court of Justice for its failure to fully implement the new laws designed to enhance transparency.

Criticizing Luxembourg’s slow response, the then Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, Věra Jourová, said: “We have stringent anti-money laundering rules at EU level, but we need all Member States to implement these rules on the ground. We don’t want any weak point in the EU that criminals could exploit.”

The Duchy’s legislators subsequently passed a law in January 2019 to establish the Luxembourg Business Register or the ‘UBO’ (Ultimate Beneficial Owners), obligating companies to provide details such as names, addresses, age, place of birth, and the extent of their interest.

Any legal entity registered with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register, including mutual funds, partnerships, foundations and foreign companies with branches in Luxembourg, must comply.

The administrators of the register did not give any reason for granting the extension but tax compliance experts have detailed the complexity of corporate structures when it comes to identifying beneficial ownership which, in the case of Luxembourg, is generally regarded as 25% or more of a company or a controlling interest.

The 2014 Luxembourg Leaks investigation, published by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and media partners in 26 countries, revealed how multinational corporations were channeling money through letterbox companies in the tiny European Duchy to take advantage of secret agreements that slashed tax bills by billions of dollars.

Luxembourg’s Finance Minister Pierre Gramegna called the investigation a “game-changer” for the country, and EU politicians credited Lux Leaks with providing momentum in the push for EU-wide public registers of company owners.

More money has been collected from the Panama Papers
OFFSHORE SECRECY

Campaigners slam ‘toothless’ COVID-19 bailout bans on tax haven companies

Jun 29, 2020
The Dirty Money List
Impact

EU targets tax avoidance with new committee

Jun 25, 2020
OFFSHORE SECRECY

Crumbling economies must tackle tax evasion to meet coronavirus crisis, experts warn

Apr 07, 2020
Image: Tim Meko / Shutterstock
DATA JOURNALISM

Explore company secrets in Lux Leaks using Datashare

Mar 23, 2020
jean-claude junker
IMPACT

Lux Leaks Confession: Jean-Claude Juncker Admits He Made ‘Major Mistake’

May 07, 2019
Image: Tim Meko / Shutterstock
IMPACT

Lux Leaks, Panama Papers spur EU to better protect whistleblowers

Apr 18, 2019
ICIJ is dedicated to ensuring all reports we publish are accurate. If you believe you have found an inaccuracy let us know.